Here is an MCVE of your problem:
use std::collections::HashMap;
struct Components {
data: HashMap<u8, Vec<u8>>,
}
impl Components {
fn add_or_update(&mut self, component: u8) {
let mut q = self.data.get(&component);
let mut queue = q.as_mut().unwrap();
queue.remove(0);
}
}
Before NLL
error[E0596]: cannot borrow immutable borrowed content `**queue` as mutable
--> src/lib.rs:11:9
|
11 | queue.remove(0);
| ^^^^^ cannot borrow as mutable
After NLL
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `**queue` as mutable, as it is behind a `&` reference
--> src/lib.rs:11:9
|
11 | queue.remove(0);
| ^^^^^ cannot borrow as mutable
Many times, when something seems surprising like this, it's useful to print out the types involved. Let's print out the type of queue
:
let mut queue: () = q.as_mut().unwrap();
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/lib.rs:10:29
|
10 | let mut queue: () = q.as_mut().unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected (), found mutable reference
|
= note: expected type `()`
found type `&mut &std::vec::Vec<u8>`
We have a mutable reference to an immutable reference to a Vec<u8>
. Because we have an immutable reference to the Vec
, we cannot modify it! Changing self.data.get
to self.data.get_mut
changes the type to &mut &mut collections::vec::Vec<u8>
and the code compiles.
If you want to implement the concept of "insert or update", you should check into the entry
API, which is more efficient and concise.
Beyond that, Rust uses snake_case
for method naming, not camelCase
.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…