hellow has shown how to get working code, but I want to dive a bit more into why your code does not compile.
The code you have proposed cannot be statically verified to be memory safe. It's entirely possible that your recursive calls attempt to access the same index. Check out this simplified code for one possibility:
use std::collections::{hash_map::Entry, HashMap};
fn compute(cache: &mut HashMap<u32, u32>) {
if let Entry::Vacant(_entry) = cache.entry(42) {
let _aliased_mutable_reference = cache.get_mut(&42).unwrap();
}
}
This now has two mutable references pointing to the same value, violating the rules of references.
Additionally, what if the inner call used entry
and it didn't exist?
use std::collections::{hash_map::Entry, HashMap};
fn compute(cache: &mut HashMap<u32, u32>) {
if let Entry::Vacant(entry1) = cache.entry(42) {
if let Entry::Vacant(entry2) = cache.entry(41) {
entry2.insert(2);
entry1.insert(1);
}
}
}
Now, when you insert the value into the map via entry2
, the map may reallocate the underlying memory, invalidating the reference held by entry1
, violating the other rule of references.
Rust has prevented you from introducing two possible types of memory unsafety into your program; just like it was designed to do.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…