Another edit to the question (2016)
Lately (as of 2016 and onward) what I've been doing, and would be my suggestion for any developer, is:
Just use Dagger 2. Wherever you need a Context
you do:
@Inject Context context;
and that's it. While at it, inject all the other stuff that would be a singleton.
Edited/improved answer (2014)
because this answer is getting kinda-of popular, I'll improve my own answer with example code of what I've been using lately (as of Jul/2014).
Start by having the application keeping a reference to itself.
public class App extends Application {
private static App instance;
public static App get() { return instance; }
@Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
instance = this;
}
}
then on any singleton that needs access to the context
I lazy load the singles in a thread safe manner using double check synchronization as explained here https://stackoverflow.com/a/11165926/906362
private static SingletonDemo instance;
public static SingletonDemo get() {
if(instance == null) instance = getSync();
return instance;
}
private static synchronized SingletonDemo getSync() {
if(instance == null) instance = new SingletonDemo();
return instance;
}
private SingletonDemo(){
// here you can directly access the Application context calling
App.get();
}
Original answer
what the documentation is suggesting is to use a normal singleton pattern
public class SingletonDemo {
private static SingletonDemo instance = null;
private SingletonDemo() { }
public static SingletonDemo getInstance() {
if (instance == null) {
instance = new SingletonDemo ();
}
return instance;
}
}
and include inside it a method like this:
private Context context;
init(Context context){
this.context = context.getApplicationContext();
}
and remember to call this to initialise the singleton.
The difference between the Application approach and the Singleton approach and why the Singleton is better is on the documentation same functionality in a more modular way
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…