What this means is that pools must be initialized after the definitions of functions to be run on them. Using pools within if __name__ == "__main__": blocks works if you are writing a standalone script, but this isn't possible in either larger code bases or server code (such as a Django or Flask project). So, if you're trying to use Pools in one of these, make sure to follow these guidelines, which are explained in the sections below:
- Initialize Pools inside functions whenever possible. If you have to initialize them in the global scope, do so at the bottom of the module.
- Do not call the methods of a Pool in the global scope.
Alternatively, if you only need better parallelism on I/O (like database accesses or network calls), you can save yourself all this headache and use pools of threads instead of pools of processes. This involves the completely undocumented:
from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
It's interface is exactly the same as that of Pool, but since it uses threads and not processes, it comes with none of the caveats that using process pools do, with the only downside being you don't get true parallelism of code execution, just parallelism in blocking I/O.
Pools must be initialized after the definitions of functions to be run on them
The inscrutable text from the python docs means that at the time the pool is defined, the surrounding module is imported by the threads in the pool. In the case of the python terminal, this means all and only code you have run so far.
So, any functions you want to use in the pool must be defined before the pool is initialized. This is true both of code in a module and code in the terminal. The following modifications of the code in the question will work fine:
from multiprocessing import Pool
def f(x): return x # FIRST
p = Pool(3) # SECOND
threads = [p.apply_async(f, [i]) for i in range(20)]
for t in threads:
try: print(t.get(timeout=1))
except Exception: pass
Or
from multiprocessing import Pool
def f(x): print(x) # FIRST
p = Pool(3) # SECOND
p.map(f, range(20))
By fine, I mean fine on Unix. Windows has it's own problems, that I'm not going into here.
Caveats to using pools in modules
But wait, there's more (to using pools in modules that you want to import elsewhere)!
If you define a pool inside a function, you have no problems. But if you are using a Pool object as a global variable in a module, it must be defined at the bottom of the page, not the top. Though this goes against most good code style, it is necessary for functionality. The way to use a pool declared at the top of a page is to only use it with functions imported from other modules, like so:
from multiprocessing import Pool
from other_module import f
p = Pool(3)
p.map(f, range(20))
Importing a pre-configured pool from another module is pretty horrific, as the import must come after whatever you want to run on it, like so:
### module.py ###
from multiprocessing import Pool
POOL = Pool(5)
### module2.py ###
def f(x):
# Some function
from module import POOL
POOL.map(f, range(10))
And second, if you run anything on the pool in the global scope of a module that you are importing, the system hangs. i.e. this doesn't work:
### module.py ###
from multiprocessing import Pool
def f(x): return x
p = Pool(1)
print(p.map(f, range(5)))
### module2.py ###
import module
This, however, does work, as long as nothing imports module2:
### module.py ###
from multiprocessing import Pool
def f(x): return x
p = Pool(1)
def run_pool(): print(p.map(f, range(5)))
### module2.py ###
import module
module.run_pool()
Now, the reasons behind this are only more bizarre, and likely related to the reason that the code in the question only spits an Attribute Error once each and after that appear to execute code properly. It also appears that pool threads (at least with some reliability) reload the code in module after executing.
