Looks like the Python compiler optimizes out the temporary tuple with this construct:
code:
import dis
def swap1():
a=5
b=4
a, b = b, a
def swap2():
a=5
b=4
c = a
a = b
b = c
print 'swap1():'
dis.dis(swap1)
print 'swap2():'
dis.dis(swap2)
output:
swap1():
6 0 LOAD_CONST 1 (5)
3 STORE_FAST 0 (a)
7 6 LOAD_CONST 2 (4)
9 STORE_FAST 1 (b)
8 12 LOAD_FAST 1 (b)
15 LOAD_FAST 0 (a)
18 ROT_TWO
19 STORE_FAST 0 (a)
22 STORE_FAST 1 (b)
25 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
28 RETURN_VALUE
swap2():
11 0 LOAD_CONST 1 (5)
3 STORE_FAST 0 (a)
12 6 LOAD_CONST 2 (4)
9 STORE_FAST 1 (b)
13 12 LOAD_FAST 0 (a)
15 STORE_FAST 2 (c)
14 18 LOAD_FAST 1 (b)
21 STORE_FAST 0 (a)
15 24 LOAD_FAST 2 (c)
27 STORE_FAST 1 (b)
30 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
33 RETURN_VALUE
Two loads, a ROT_TWO
, and two saves, versus three loads and three saves. You are unlikely to find a faster mechanism.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…