strlen
usually works by counting the characters in a string until a
character is found. A canonical implementation would be:
size_t strlen (char *str) {
size_t len = 0;
while (*str != '') {
str++;
len++;
}
return len;
}
As for possible inherent bugs in the function, there are none - it works exactly as documented. That's not to say it doesn't have certain problems, to wit:
- if you pass it a "string" that doesn't have a
at the end, you may run into problems but technically, that's not a C string (a) and it's your own fault.
- you can't put
characters within your string but, again, it wouldn't be a C string in that case.
- it's not the most efficient way - you could store a length up front so you could get the length much quicker.
But none of these are bugs, they're just consequences of a design decision.
On that last bullet point, see also this excellent article by Joel Spolsky where he discusses various string formats and their characteristics, including normal C strings (with a terminator), Pascal strings (with a length) and the combination of the two, null terminated Pascal strings.
Though he has a more, shall we say, "colorful" term for that final type, one which frequently comes to mind whenever I thing of Python's excellent (and totally unrelated) f-strings :-)
(a) A C string is defined as a series of non-terminator characters (any character other than
) followed by a terminator. Hence this definition disallows both embedded terminators within the sequence, and sequences without such a terminator. Or, putting it more succinctly (as per the ISO C standard):
A string is a contiguous sequence of characters terminated by and including the first null character.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…