O(n!)
isn't equivalent to O(n^n)
. It is asymptotically less than O(n^n)
.
O(log(n!))
is equal to O(n log(n))
. Here is one way to prove that:
Note that by using the log rule log(mn) = log(m) + log(n)
we can see that:
log(n!) = log(n*(n-1)*...2*1) = log(n) + log(n-1) + ... log(2) + log(1)
Proof that O(log(n!)) ? O(n log(n))
:
log(n!) = log(n) + log(n-1) + ... log(2) + log(1)
Which is less than:
log(n) + log(n) + log(n) + log(n) + ... + log(n) = n*log(n)
So O(log(n!))
is a subset of O(n log(n))
Proof that O(n log(n)) ? O(log(n!))
:
log(n!) = log(n) + log(n-1) + ... log(2) + log(1)
Which is greater than (the left half of that expression with all (n-x)
replaced by n/2
:
log(n/2) + log(n/2) + ... + log(n/2) = floor(n/2)*log(floor(n/2)) ∈ O(n log(n))
So O(n log(n))
is a subset of O(log(n!))
.
Since O(n log(n)) ? O(log(n!)) ? O(n log(n))
, they are equivalent big-Oh classes.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…