Since a lot of programmers were overwhelmed with the [DataContract]
and [DataMember]
attributes, with .NET 3.5 SP1, Microsoft made the data contract serializer handle all classes - even without any of those attributes - much like the old XML serializer.
So as of .NET 3.5 SP1, you don't have to add data contract or data member attributes anymore - if you don't then the data contract serializer will serialize all public properties on your class, just like the XML serializer would.
HOWEVER: by not adding those attributes, you lose a lot of useful capabilities:
- without
[DataContract]
, you cannot define an XML namespace for your data to live in
- without
[DataMember]
, you cannot serialize non-public properties or fields
- without
[DataMember]
, you cannot define an order of serialization (Order=
) and the DCS will serialize all properties alphabetically
- without
[DataMember]
, you cannot define a different name for your property (Name=
)
- without
[DataMember]
, you cannot define things like IsRequired=
or other useful attributes
- without
[DataMember]
, you cannot leave out certain public properties - all public properties will be serialized by the DCS
So for a "quick'n'dirty" solution, leaving away the [DataContract]
and [DataMember]
attributes will work - but it's still a good idea to have them on your data classes - just to be more explicit about what you're doing, and to give yourself access to all those additional features that you don't get without them...
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…