You model the time function to calculate Fib(n)
as sum of time to calculate Fib(n-1)
plus the time to calculate Fib(n-2)
plus the time to add them together (O(1)
). This is assuming that repeated evaluations of the same Fib(n)
take the same time - i.e. no memoization is use.
T(n<=1) = O(1)
T(n) = T(n-1) + T(n-2) + O(1)
You solve this recurrence relation (using generating functions, for instance) and you'll end up with the answer.
Alternatively, you can draw the recursion tree, which will have depth n
and intuitively figure out that this function is asymptotically O(2
n
)
. You can then prove your conjecture by induction.
Base: n = 1
is obvious
Assume T(n-1) = O(2
n-1
)
, therefore
T(n) = T(n-1) + T(n-2) + O(1)
which is equal to
T(n) = O(2
n-1
) + O(2
n-2
) + O(1) = O(2
n
)
However, as noted in a comment, this is not the tight bound. An interesting fact about this function is that the T(n) is asymptotically the same as the value of Fib(n)
since both are defined as
f(n) = f(n-1) + f(n-2)
.
The leaves of the recursion tree will always return 1. The value of Fib(n)
is sum of all values returned by the leaves in the recursion tree which is equal to the count of leaves. Since each leaf will take O(1) to compute, T(n)
is equal to Fib(n) x O(1)
. Consequently, the tight bound for this function is the Fibonacci sequence itself (~θ(1.6
n
)
). You can find out this tight bound by using generating functions as I'd mentioned above.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…