According to the paper it was proposed in, N3638, it is explicitly valid to do so.
Relevant snippet:
auto x = 5; // OK: x has type int
const auto *v = &x, u = 6; // OK: v has type const int*, u has type const int
static auto y = 0.0; // OK: y has type double
auto int r; // error: auto is not a storage-class-specifier
auto f() -> int; // OK: f returns int
auto g() { return 0.0; } // OK: g returns double
auto h(); // OK, h's return type will be deduced when it is defined
However it goes on to say:
If the type of an entity with an undeduced placeholder type is needed to determine the type of an expression, the program is ill-formed. But once a return statement has been seen in a function, the return type deduced from that statement can be used in the rest of the function, including in other return statements.
auto n = n; // error, n's type is unknown
auto f();
void g() { &f; } // error, f's return type is unknown
auto sum(int i) {
if (i == 1)
return i; // sum's return type is int
else
return sum(i-1)+i; // OK, sum's return type has been deduced
}
So the fact that you used it before it was defined causes it to error.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…